People ex rel. Boyle v. Ormond
This text of 204 A.D. 844 (People ex rel. Boyle v. Ormond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relator having failed to construct her house in accordance with the established grade of 1892, is not entitled to damages under section 951 of the Greater New York charter, notwithstanding the fact that the street had not been improved and graded in accordance with the map filed. (People ex rel. Sciarillo v. Hennessy, 152 App. Div. 944; affd., 206 N. Y. 740; People ex rel. Flaxman v. Hennessy, 74 Misc. Rep. 166; People ex rel. Architects’ Offices, Inc., v. Ormond, 201 App. Div. 787.) The order is, therefore, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the proceeding dismissed. Blaekmar, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Manning, JJ., concur; Kelby, J., dissents on the ground that the city is estopped from denying that the natural grade on which the city paved and made assessments for improvements -is other than the so-called established grade.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-boyle-v-ormond-nyappdiv-1922.