People ex rel. Boyd v. Ruoff

160 A.D. 899, 144 N.Y.S. 1137

This text of 160 A.D. 899 (People ex rel. Boyd v. Ruoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Boyd v. Ruoff, 160 A.D. 899, 144 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

—We think, considering the short period of service of the relator, and the volume of work done by him, that the number of errors made by him was not sufficient to establish incompetency on his part. None of the errors showed a hopeless incompetency, and a few days more of service might have resulted in a relative perfection. Before a final determination of incompetency was reached a better opportunity should have been afforded the relator. Therefore, the determination of the county clerk is annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and the relator reinstated. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 A.D. 899, 144 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-boyd-v-ruoff-nyappdiv-1913.