People ex rel. Bornstein v. La Vallee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Bornstein v. La Vallee

51 A.D.2d 1073, 381 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1073 (People ex rel. Bornstein v. La Vallee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Bornstein v. La Vallee, 51 A.D.2d 1073, 381 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme [1074]*1074Court at Special Term, entered June 18, 1975 in Clinton County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. The petitioner pleaded guilty in Washington County to seven counts of the crime of sodomy. Thereafter, he appealed to this court which affirmed the judgment of conviction (42 AD2d 926). On this appeal it is contended that the indictment failed to allege a crime. Special Term found that the indictment fairly apprised the petitioner of his wrongful act by setting forth each element of the crime charged. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme [1074]*1074Court at Special Term, entered June 18, 1975 in Clinton County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. The petitioner pleaded guilty in Washington County to seven counts of the crime of sodomy. Thereafter, he appealed to this court which affirmed the judgment of conviction (42 AD2d 926). On this appeal it is contended that the indictment failed to allege a crime. Special Term found that the indictment fairly apprised the petitioner of his wrongful act by setting forth each element of the crime charged. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1073, 381 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bornstein-v-la-vallee-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack