People ex rel. Borden v. Delaware Common Pleas

2 Wend. 255
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sutherland, J.

The papers are defec¡-¡ve_ The court are not apprized of the grounds on which the alternative mandamus was ordered. The papers on which the original motion was made should be presented to -the court on the coming in of the return to the alternative mandamus, and the relator should state in writing the points relied upon in support of his application.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Borden v. Delaware Common Pleas, 2 Wend. 255 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 255 (People ex rel. Borden v. Delaware Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. City of Charleston
17 W. Va. 595 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
Commercial Bank v. Canal Commissioners
10 Wend. 25 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1832)