People ex rel. Boenig v. Hegeman

172 A.D. 94, 157 N.Y.S. 1054, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5375

This text of 172 A.D. 94 (People ex rel. Boenig v. Hegeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Boenig v. Hegeman, 172 A.D. 94, 157 N.Y.S. 1054, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinions

Per Curiam:

The failure to affix the county seal was fatal to the tax warrant and to the attempted sale under it. (Brase v. Miller, 195 N. Y. 204; Matter of City of Rochester v. Bloss, 77 App. Div. 28; affd., 173 N. Y. 646.) For such jurisdictional defects tax deeds may be canceled within five years after the redemption period. (Tax Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 60; Laws of 1909, chap. 62], § 132.)

As his deeds had been on record over three years, relator invokes the presumption of regularity of the tax sale, and the proceedings prior thereto, declared by section 132 as to conveyances which have been two years recorded. While certain irregularities may be thereby cured, the Legislature has extended to five years the period within which tax deeds may be canceled for jurisdictional defects. (Adirondack League Club v. Keyes, 122 App. Div. 178.)

The special statute designed to cure this omission of the county seal (Laws of 1911, chap. 470) could not transfer title to the relator by taking away rights already vested. (People v. Inman, 197 N. Y. 200.)

The determination should be confirmed and the writ of certiorari dismissed, hut without costs.

Thomas, Eich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., read to sustain the writ, with whom Jenks, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Rochester v. . Bloss
66 N.E. 1105 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Brase v. . Miller
88 N.E. 359 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
People v. . Inman
90 N.E. 438 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Ensign v. . Barse
14 N.E. 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Cromwell v. . MacLean
25 N.E. 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Hagner v. Hall
10 A.D. 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
City of Rochester v. Bloss
77 A.D. 28 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Adirondack League Club v. Keyes
122 A.D. 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 94, 157 N.Y.S. 1054, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-boenig-v-hegeman-nyappdiv-1916.