People ex rel. Bilbrew v. Scully
This text of 209 A.D.2d 564 (People ex rel. Bilbrew v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), entered April 13, 1993, which denied the petition.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D.2d 564, 621 N.Y.S.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bilbrew-v-scully-nyappdiv-1994.