People ex rel. Biggins v. Henderson

54 A.D.2d 605, 387 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13997

This text of 54 A.D.2d 605 (People ex rel. Biggins v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Biggins v. Henderson, 54 A.D.2d 605, 387 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Appellant seeks review of the judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, which denied a writ of habeas corpus premised upon an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right of pro se representation. This question having been determined by prior appeal, habeas corpus is not available. (See People v Pitman [Biggins], 25 AD2d 637, mod on other grounds and affd 18 NY2d 919.) (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Mahoney, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pitman
223 N.E.2d 494 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
People v. Pitman
25 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 605, 387 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-biggins-v-henderson-nyappdiv-1976.