People ex rel. Biggins v. Henderson

54 A.D.2d 605, 387 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13997

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Appellant seeks review of the judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, which denied a writ of habeas corpus premised upon an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right of pro se representation. This question having been determined by prior appeal, habeas corpus is not available. (See People v Pitman [Biggins], 25 AD2d 637, mod on other grounds and affd 18 NY2d 919.) (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Mahoney, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Biggins v. Henderson, 54 A.D.2d 605, 387 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 605 (People ex rel. Biggins v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pitman
223 N.E.2d 494 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
People v. Pitman
25 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)