People ex rel. Bentley v. Scully
This text of 177 A.D.2d 732 (People ex rel. Bentley v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered December 12, 1989, which denied the application for a writ.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The arguments made by the appellant in support of his application for a writ of habeas corpus were, or could have been, advanced either on his direct appeal from the underlying judgment of conviction, or in a prior habeas corpus proceeding. The Supreme Court was, therefore, correct in denying the application on those grounds (see, CPLR 7003 [b]; People ex rel. Goss v Smith, 69 NY2d 727, 729, affg 116 AD2d 968; People ex rel. Patterson v Senkowski, 175 AD2d 957; People ex [733]*733rel. Bresette v Superintendent, 175 AD2d 961; People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 67 AD2d 587, affd 50 NY2d 901; cf., People ex rel. Keitt v McMann, 18 NY2d 257, 262). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.D.2d 732, 576 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bentley-v-scully-nyappdiv-1991.