People ex rel. Bekoris v. Truesdell
This text of 259 A.D. 1091 (People ex rel. Bekoris v. Truesdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding to procure relator’s release from custody on the ground that by testifying before the grand jury, without signing a waiver, he became entitled to immunity from prosecution (Penal Law, §§ 584, 996), order dismissing the writ of habeas corpus affirmed. Relator testified to nothing before the grand jury except his name and address. Such evidence would not constitute a link in the chain of evidence against him (People ex rel. Coyle v. Truesdell, 259 App. Div. 282), and did not entitle him to immunity. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, CarsweU, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1091, 21 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bekoris-v-truesdell-nyappdiv-1940.