People ex rel. Bedoya v. Keane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Bedoya v. Keane

206 A.D.2d 494, 615 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13717

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 18, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.) entered July 24, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the petitioner’s application was procedurally barred. The three claims raised by the petitioner in this proceeding could have been raised on direct appeal or by collateral attack in the court in which he was convicted (see, People ex rel. Benbow v Scully, 189 AD2d 844). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.) entered July 24, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the petitioner’s application was procedurally barred. The three claims raised by the petitioner in this proceeding could have been raised on direct appeal or by collateral attack in the court in which he was convicted (see, People ex rel. Benbow v Scully, 189 AD2d 844). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Bedoya v. Keane, 206 A.D.2d 494, 615 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 494 (People ex rel. Bedoya v. Keane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related