People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond

222 A.D. 756
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 222 A.D. 756 (People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond, 222 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Judgment, or final order, unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon opinion of Mr. Justice Tompkins at Special Term. [Reported in 126 Misc. 239.] We are inclined to the view that what the bridge company was using, in its maintenance and operation, constituted a special franchise which was taxable only as such, within the authority of People ex rel. R., S. & E. R. R. Co. v. Moroney (224 N. Y. 114). Present — Young, Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Cold Storage Co. v. Boyland
28 Misc. 2d 205 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Banks v. Talley
194 A. 362 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
Bush Terminal Co. v. City of New York
152 Misc. 144 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bear-mountain-hudson-river-bridge-co-v-dimond-nyappdiv-1927.