People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond
This text of 222 A.D. 756 (People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, or final order, unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon opinion of Mr. Justice Tompkins at Special Term. [Reported in 126 Misc. 239.] We are inclined to the view that what the bridge company was using, in its maintenance and operation, constituted a special franchise which was taxable only as such, within the authority of People ex rel. R., S. & E. R. R. Co. v. Moroney (224 N. Y. 114). Present — Young, Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bear-mountain-hudson-river-bridge-co-v-dimond-nyappdiv-1927.