People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond
222 A.D. 756
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Judgment, or final order, unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon opinion of Mr. Justice Tompkins at Special Term. [Reported in 126 Misc. 239.] We are inclined to the view that what the bridge company was using, in its maintenance and operation, constituted a special franchise which was taxable only as such, within the authority of People ex rel. R., S. & E. R. R. Co. v. Moroney (224 N. Y. 114). Present — Young, Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond, 222 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
222 A.D. 756 (People ex rel. Bear Mountain Hudson River Bridge Co. v. Dimond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Cold Storage Co. v. Boyland
28 Misc. 2d 205 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Banks v. Talley
194 A. 362 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
Bush Terminal Co. v. City of New York
152 Misc. 144 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)