People ex rel. Bavisotto v. Walker

199 A.D.2d 976, 608 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12562

This text of 199 A.D.2d 976 (People ex rel. Bavisotto v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Bavisotto v. Walker, 199 A.D.2d 976, 608 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly dismissed the petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Even assuming that the amendment to CPL 470.05 applies to petitioner’s case, the record shows that, under either version of the statute, petitioner failed to preserve the [977]*977issue now argued concerning sealing of wiretap tapes. Petitioner’s reliance on People v Cantineri (134 AD2d 856) is misplaced because the basis for reversal in that case was that the eavesdropping warrant had expired before the conversations implicating Cantineri were intercepted. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.— Habeas Corpus.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cantineri
134 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 A.D.2d 976, 608 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bavisotto-v-walker-nyappdiv-1993.