People ex rel. Barrett v. Scully

203 A.D.2d 311, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated June 2, 1992, which denied the writ.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel could have been raised on a direct appeal from his judgment of conviction, and therefore the relief of habeas corpus does not lie (see, People ex rel. Goss v Smith, 69 NY2d 727).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Barrett v. Scully, 203 A.D.2d 311, 612 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 311 (People ex rel. Barrett v. Scully) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Franza v. Connolly
140 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Taylor v. Kuhlmann
36 F. Supp. 2d 534 (E.D. New York, 1999)
People ex rel. Warner v. Mahoney
252 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People ex rel. Brown v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional
252 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Garcia v. Scully
907 F. Supp. 700 (S.D. New York, 1995)