People ex rel. Barrett v. Anders

173 Ill. App. 561, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 456
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 7, 1912·No. Gen. No. 17,713·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was found guilty in a prosecution under the statute upon a complaint for bastardy.

The errors complained of are that the Municipal Court of Chicago had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter ; that after the trial began a supplemental complaint was filed alleging the birth of the child, which submitted another issue to the jury, on which the defendant did not plead, and that the defendant was erroneously ordered to pay the costs. We think that the Municipal Court had jurisdiction under the Municipal Court Act; also that even if the proceeding was irregular as to the supplemental complaint, the defendant, proceeding in the trial without objection, waived same. The costs followed the conviction under the statute.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Barrett v. Anders, 173 Ill. App. 561, 1912 Ill. App. LEXIS 456 (Ill. Ct. App. 1912).

173 Ill. App. 561 (People ex rel. Barrett v. Anders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suhling
231 Ill. App. 256 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1924)