People ex rel. Baron v. Teitelbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Baron v. Teitelbaum

10 A.D.2d 709, 202 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 709 (People ex rel. Baron v. Teitelbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Baron v. Teitelbaum, 10 A.D.2d 709, 202 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, containing the original transcript of the stenographic minutes on the hearing, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for the respondents, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before April 26, 1960, with notice of argument for the June 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur— Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, containing the original transcript of the stenographic minutes on the hearing, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for the respondents, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before April 26, 1960, with notice of argument for the June 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur— Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 709, 202 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-baron-v-teitelbaum-nyappdiv-1960.