People ex rel. Baptiste v. Spota
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3010 (People ex rel. Baptiste v. Spota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Suffolk County Indictment No. 0396/ 16, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the filing fee is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 3010, 149 A.D.3d 973, 50 N.Y.S.3d 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-baptiste-v-spota-nyappdiv-2017.