People ex rel. Bankhead v. Hammock
This text of 107 A.D.2d 775 (People ex rel. Bankhead v. Hammock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Palella, J.), dated January 3,1983, which dismissed the petition and denied the writ.
Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The record indicates that (1) petitioner agreed to comply with condition number 8 of his conditions of release, i.e., that he would not “violate the provisions of any law” to which he was subject and which provided “for a penalty of imprisonment”, and (2) petitioner violated that condition. Accordingly, his parole was properly revoked. We have examined petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit (see Executive Law, § 259-d; People ex rel. Mendolia v Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, 47 NY2d 779). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A.D.2d 775, 484 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bankhead-v-hammock-nyappdiv-1985.