People ex rel. Baker v. Warden

17 A.D.3d 266, 793 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4272
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[267]*267Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), entered on or about June 30, 2004, which denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is clear from the record that the petitioner knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to a preliminary parole revocation hearing (Matter of White v New York State Div. of Parole, 60 NY2d 920 [1983]) when he subscribed his name to a handwritten notation on a court form stating: “I hereby wish to waive my preliminary hearing.” The contention that respondents failed to submit evidence establishing the genuineness of the signature is unpreserved for appellate review. Significantly, petitioner failed to meet his burden of demonstrating to the contrary. We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Baker v. Warden, 17 A.D.3d 266, 793 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

17 A.D.3d 266 (People ex rel. Baker v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. New York & Presbyt. Hosp.
219 A.D.3d 75 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Alvarado v. City of New York
482 F. Supp. 2d 332 (S.D. New York, 2007)