People ex rel. Baker v. Lefevre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Baker v. Lefevre

216 A.D.2d 620, 627 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 620 (People ex rel. Baker v. Lefevre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Baker v. Lefevre, 216 A.D.2d 620, 627 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered August 29, 1994 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges his removal from a temporary release program after an unauthorized absence. He claims that his removal from the program without a prior Superintendent’s disciplinary hearing violated his right to procedural due process. We find petitioner’s argument unpersuasive. The temporary release hearing provided to petitioner afforded him due process (see, Matter of Nieves v Recore, 206 AD2d 778). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered August 29, 1994 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges his removal from a temporary release program after an unauthorized absence. He claims that his removal from the program without a prior Superintendent’s disciplinary hearing violated his right to procedural due process. We find petitioner’s argument unpersuasive. The temporary release hearing provided to petitioner afforded him due process (see, Matter of Nieves v Recore, 206 AD2d 778). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 620, 627 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-baker-v-lefevre-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack