People ex rel. Baines v. McGrath

241 N.E.2d 134, 22 N.Y.2d 885, 294 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1169
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 1968·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: The court, in the exercise of its power of review, is not required to approve [886]*886the amounts fixed as bail for each of the relators, as if it were determining the amount of bail in the first instance. It suffices that it concludes that the amounts thus fixed are not excessive as a matter of law, and, therefore, not in violation of constitutional limitations. (People ex rel. Lobell v. McDonnell, 296 N. Y. 109; People ex rel. Rao v. Adams, 296 N. Y. 231; People ex rel. Gonzales v. Warden, 21 N Y 2d 18, 25.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Baines v. McGrath, 241 N.E.2d 134, 22 N.Y.2d 885, 294 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1169 (N.Y. 1968).

241 N.E.2d 134 (People ex rel. Baines v. McGrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Lobell v. McDonnell
71 N.E.2d 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
People Ex Rel. Rao v. Adams
72 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)