People ex rel. Baines v. McGrath

241 N.E.2d 134, 22 N.Y.2d 885, 294 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1169
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 25, 1968
StatusPublished

This text of 241 N.E.2d 134 (People ex rel. Baines v. McGrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Baines v. McGrath, 241 N.E.2d 134, 22 N.Y.2d 885, 294 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1169 (N.Y. 1968).

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: The court, in the exercise of its power of review, is not required to approve [886]*886the amounts fixed as bail for each of the relators, as if it were determining the amount of bail in the first instance. It suffices that it concludes that the amounts thus fixed are not excessive as a matter of law, and, therefore, not in violation of constitutional limitations. (People ex rel. Lobell v. McDonnell, 296 N. Y. 109; People ex rel. Rao v. Adams, 296 N. Y. 231; People ex rel. Gonzales v. Warden, 21 N Y 2d 18, 25.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Lobell v. McDonnell
71 N.E.2d 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
People Ex Rel. Rao v. Adams
72 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 N.E.2d 134, 22 N.Y.2d 885, 294 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-baines-v-mcgrath-ny-1968.