People ex rel. Badamo v. Foster
This text of 272 A.D.2d 968 (People ex rel. Badamo v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Clinton County Court which dismissed appellant-relator’s writ of habeas corpus. Relator contends that his sentence as a second offender was jurisdictionally invalid in that his prior conviction in 1932, in a Federal [969]*969court, of uttering a counterfeit Federal Reserve note was not then an offense of felony grade under the penal laws of our State. We are of the opinion that relator’s prior offense constituted a felony under our forgery statutes as they stood in 1932 (Penal Law, § 881, subds. 1, 3; § 887), and prior to the 1934 amendment (L. 1934, ch. 614). Order affirmed, without costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-badamo-v-foster-nyappdiv-1947.