People ex rel. Austin v. Henderson

54 A.D.2d 613, 387 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14013

This text of 54 A.D.2d 613 (People ex rel. Austin v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Austin v. Henderson, 54 A.D.2d 613, 387 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Relator is presently incarcerated in Auburn Correctional Facility pursuant to an indeterminate sentence of three years to life imprisonment for the crime of criminally selling a controlled substance, third degree. In this habeas corpus proceeding he contends that the sentence is excessive and cruel and inhuman because he should have been sentenced to a drug rehabilitation center. The sentence is proper under the mandatory provisions of the statute (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd 3, par [a]) and the statute is constitutional (People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100). Relator’s reliance upon our decision in People v Young (46 AD2d 202) is misplaced inasmuch as defendant in that case was sentenced under the nonmandatory sentence provisions of the former statute. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court,—habeas corpus.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Broadie
332 N.E.2d 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Young
46 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 613, 387 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-austin-v-henderson-nyappdiv-1976.