People ex rel. Attorney General v. Thierry

91 Colo. 581
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 12, 1932
DocketNo. 13,050
StatusPublished

This text of 91 Colo. 581 (People ex rel. Attorney General v. Thierry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Attorney General v. Thierry, 91 Colo. 581 (Colo. 1932).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

[582]*582Joseph Thierry was charged with contempt in a disciplinary proceeding against a Colorado attorney instituted by the attorney general on order of this court. Neither this disciplinary action nor this contempt charge was caused to be instituted by the interposition or action of our grievance committee. After' issues joined, the cause was referred to a referee, Hon. Stanley T. Wall-bank, who filed his report September 22, 1932, finding-respondent guilty of contempt of this court, whereupon respondent was allowed twenty days within which to file exceptions thereto. No exceptions were filed within that time.

The referee’s report discloses that in February, 1930, Thierry made an unsworn statement charging a Denver lawyer with gross unprofessional conduct for the purpose of being, and thereafter to be, used in disbarment proceedings against him.

In January, 1930, disbarment proceedings (No. 12,543) were instituted, based, inter alia, upon said statement and therein before Mr. Justice Burke, to whom the case had been referred, respondent swore in effect that the statement was untrue.

We approve the referee’s report which sets forth in detail the charge and testimony herein and that given before Mr. Justice Burke in the disbarment proceedings.

.. We find the respondent, Joseph Thierry, guilty of criminal contempt of this court; decree that he be fined therefor the sum of $100', and that he be incarcerated forthwith in the jail of the City and County of Denver and there held for a period of one month or until said fine has been paid or until further order of this court.

Mr. Justice Alter concurs in the conclusion but believes that the penalty is inadequate.

Mr. Justice Butler specially concurs.

Mr. Justice Hilliard dissents.

Mr. Justice Burke not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thompson
17 P.2d 538 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 Colo. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-attorney-general-v-thierry-colo-1932.