People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Castleman

294 P. 535, 88 Colo. 207
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 15, 1930
DocketNo. 12,716.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 294 P. 535 (People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Castleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Castleman, 294 P. 535, 88 Colo. 207 (Colo. 1930).

Opinion

*208 Mr. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Information in contempt against respondent was filed by the Attorney General by direction of the Court, charging him with practicing law without license or authority, and he was ruled to show cause within twenty days after service why he should not be punished therefor. He was personally served October 21, 1930. Having failed to answer, the Attorney General moved December 6, following, that judgment be entered on the pleadings and the motion was granted.

The evidence against respondent is of record and before us. It consists of the fact that his name does not appear on the roll of attorneys in the office of the Clerk of this Court, and the certificate of the clerk of the district court of the City and County of Denver that he appeared therein as counsel for the defendant in case No. 30522, pending in that court, and as such participated in the trial, and that no. order of said court was entered permitting that appearance. In addition thereto there appears in our files as an exhibit the professional card of respondent and his partner, advertising themselves as “lawyers” and giving their Denver office address and phone number.

In view of the foregoing it clearly appears, and the Court so. finds, that respondent is guilty of practicing law in this state without a license, and without any authority, and contrary to the statutes in such case made and provided.

It is accordingly ordered that respondent be confined in the county jail of the City and County of Denver for twenty days unless he shall sooner pay to the Clerk of this Court the sum of $100, and that mittimus be issued accordingly.

Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Butler not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Binkley v. People
716 P.2d 1111 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1986)
Bessemer Bar Ass'n v. Fitzpatrick
196 So. 733 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1940)
State Ex Rel. Boynton v. Perkins
28 P.2d 765 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 P. 535, 88 Colo. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-attorney-general-v-castleman-colo-1930.