People ex rel. Attorney General v. Brown

247 P.2d 682, 126 Colo. 222, 1952 Colo. LEXIS 208
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedAugust 18, 1952
DocketNo. 16,897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 P.2d 682 (People ex rel. Attorney General v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Attorney General v. Brown, 247 P.2d 682, 126 Colo. 222, 1952 Colo. LEXIS 208 (Colo. 1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the matter of our rule requiring the respondent Lloyd Brown to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt of court for holding himself out as an attorney at law, not having a license to practice as such as required by the provisions of section 1, chapter 1, ’35 C.S.A., we have considered the complaint of the relator Attorney General, together with exhibit and the answer thereto, and it appearing therefrom that the respondent engaged in the practice of law and so admits:

Now, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the said Lloyd L. Brown, by reason of said unauthorized practice was and is guilty of contempt of the authority of this court. §21, c. 14, ’35 C.S.A.

It is further ordered that the said Lloyd L. Brown be punished for said contempt by paying into the registry of this court a fine in the sum of one hundred dollars ($100.00); and that he make such payment within fifteen days from the date hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Root
249 P.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 P.2d 682, 126 Colo. 222, 1952 Colo. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-attorney-general-v-brown-colo-1952.