People ex rel. Armstrong v. Court of Common Pleas
20 Johns. 22
This text of 20 Johns. 22 (People ex rel. Armstrong v. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People ex rel. Armstrong v. Court of Common Pleas, 20 Johns. 22 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).
Opinion
Courts of Common Pleas are creatures of statute, and, in every sense, inferior Courts. They have no power, except by statute, to grant new trials. They cannot entertain a writ of error coram nobis, nor a writ of error of any description. (Arnold v. Sandford, 14 Johns. Rep. 417.) The rule must be made absolute.
Rule absolute..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Ernst
192 N.W. 65 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
Maruccoro v. E. D. & A. F. Cronk, Inc.
95 Misc. 86 (New York County Courts, 1916)
Ætna Accident & Liability Co. v. Lyman
144 N.W. 278 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1913)
Teller v. Wetherell
6 Mich. 46 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1858)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 Johns. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-armstrong-v-court-of-common-pleas-nysupct-1822.