People ex rel. Armstrong v. Court of Common Pleas
20 Johns. 22
Opinion
Courts of Common Pleas are creatures of statute, and, in every sense, inferior Courts. They have no power, except by statute, to grant new trials. They cannot entertain a writ of error coram nobis, nor a writ of error of any description. (Arnold v. Sandford, 14 Johns. Rep. 417.) The rule must be made absolute.
Rule absolute..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Armstrong v. Court of Common Pleas, 20 Johns. 22 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).
20 Johns. 22 (People ex rel. Armstrong v. Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Ernst
192 N.W. 65 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
Maruccoro v. E. D. & A. F. Cronk, Inc.
95 Misc. 86 (New York County Courts, 1916)
Ætna Accident & Liability Co. v. Lyman
144 N.W. 278 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1913)
Teller v. Wetherell
6 Mich. 46 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1858)