People ex rel. Amperse v. Circuit Judge

14 Mich. 33, 1865 Mich. LEXIS 59
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 11, 1865·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

By virtue of § 3736 of the ComjD. Laws, the plaintiff was entitled to double costs. No fact was required to appear on the trial, to be certified on the minutes of the Court, in order to perfect his right. The correct practice would have been to appeal from the decision of the taxing officer, and then bring the decision of the Circuit Court, if adverse, into this Court by writ of error.

The mandamus, being asked for, to direct the Circuit Judge to do an act not necessary to be done, must be denied; but, as the practice in this matter has been unsettled, the denial of the writ is without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Amperse v. Circuit Judge, 14 Mich. 33, 1865 Mich. LEXIS 59 (Mich. 1865).

14 Mich. 33 (People ex rel. Amperse v. Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v Kardasz
Michigan Supreme Court, 2025
State Highway Commissioner v. Ottawa Circuit Judge
339 Mich. 390 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1954)
Quandt v. Schwass
282 N.W. 206 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)