People ex rel. Alonzo v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Alonzo v. New York State Division of Parole

254 A.D.2d 317, 678 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10002

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1998·Published

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), entered March 22, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s assertions that his attorney acted without his consent when requesting an adjournment of his final parole revocation hearing are without merit (see, People ex rel. Bush v Stenzel, 195 AD2d 495). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), entered March 22, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s assertions that his attorney acted without his consent when requesting an adjournment of his final parole revocation hearing are without merit (see, People ex rel. Bush v Stenzel, 195 AD2d 495). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Alonzo v. New York State Division of Parole, 254 A.D.2d 317, 678 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

254 A.D.2d 317 (People ex rel. Alonzo v. New York State Division of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related