People ex rel. Agosto v. Warden
This text of 211 A.D.2d 652 (People ex rel. Agosto v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Kings County Indictment No. 14696/94.
Upon the papers filed in support of the application and after hearing oral argument in support of the application and in opposition thereto, it is
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 A.D.2d 652, 621 N.Y.S.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-agosto-v-warden-nyappdiv-1995.