People ex rel. Addisone v. Foster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Addisone v. Foster

272 A.D.2d 1035

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1035 (People ex rel. Addisone v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Addisone v. Foster, 272 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified on the law by providing that the relator be returned td the Court of General Sessions of Few York County for resentence on the ground that the conviction in the State of Few Jersey, which conviction was used to establish that relator was a fourth offender, was not the conviction of a crime which would necessarily be a felony in the State of Few York as contemplated by the provisions of section 1942 of the Penal Law, which section must be strictly construed (People ex rel. Carollo v. Brophy, 294 F. Y. 540, 544), and as so modified affirmed^ without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling, J., not voting, and Love, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator to the custody of defendant.) Present — Dowling, Harris, McCum, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified on the law by providing that the relator be returned td the Court of General Sessions of Few York County for resentence on the ground that the conviction in the State of Few Jersey, which conviction was used to establish that relator was a fourth offender, was not the conviction of a crime which would necessarily be a felony in the State of Few York as contemplated by the provisions of section 1942 of the Penal Law, which section must be strictly construed (People ex rel. Carollo v. Brophy, 294 F. Y. 540, 544), and as so modified affirmed^ without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling, J., not voting, and Love, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator to the custody of defendant.) Present — Dowling, Harris, McCum, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-addisone-v-foster-nyappdiv-1947.