People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann
This text of 23 A.D.2d 936 (People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. The delay of three and one-half months in pronouncing sentence was not within the rule “to be applied to extremely long and unreasonable delays only ”. (People ex rel. Party v. Fay (10 N Y 2d 374, 379.) The court did not lose jurisdiction and no procedural objection under section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was raised. (Matter of Hogan V. Bohan, 305 N. Y. 110,112; People ex rel. Battista v. Christian, 249 N. Y. 334; [937]*937People ex reí. Márchese v. La Vaillee, 23 A D 2d 537; People v. Pérsico, 45 Mise 2d 421; People v. Warrelman, 42 Mise 2d 783.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-accurso-v-mcmann-nyappdiv-1965.