People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann

23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 24, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 A.D.2d 936 (People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann, 23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. The delay of three and one-half months in pronouncing sentence was not within the rule “to be applied to extremely long and unreasonable delays only ”. (People ex rel. Party v. Fay (10 N Y 2d 374, 379.) The court did not lose jurisdiction and no procedural objection under section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was raised. (Matter of Hogan V. Bohan, 305 N. Y. 110,112; People ex rel. Battista v. Christian, 249 N. Y. 334; [937]*937People ex reí. Márchese v. La Vaillee, 23 A D 2d 537; People v. Pérsico, 45 Mise 2d 421; People v. Warrelman, 42 Mise 2d 783.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harper
137 Misc. 2d 357 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-accurso-v-mcmann-nyappdiv-1965.