People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann

23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. The delay of three and one-half months in pronouncing sentence was not within the rule “to be applied to extremely long and unreasonable delays only ”. (People ex rel. Party v. Fay (10 N Y 2d 374, 379.) The court did not lose jurisdiction and no procedural objection under section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was raised. (Matter of Hogan V. Bohan, 305 N. Y. 110,112; People ex rel. Battista v. Christian, 249 N. Y. 334; [937] People ex reí. Márchese v. La Vaillee, 23 A D 2d 537; People v. Pérsico, 45 Mise 2d 421; People v. Warrelman, 42 Mise 2d 783.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann, 23 A.D.2d 936, 259 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 936 (People ex rel. Accurso v. McMann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harper
137 Misc. 2d 357 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1987)