People ex rel. Abdullah v. Walker
This text of 199 A.D.2d 1074 (People ex rel. Abdullah v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Habeas corpus relief is not a proper remedy where the issues raised in the petition were, or could have been, raised on direct appeal or by a CPL article 440 motion (see, People ex rel. Willette v Coughlin, 184 AD2d 926, lv denied 80 NY2d 759; People ex rel. Van Patten v Walker, 174 AD2d 1058, lv denied 78 NY2d 859). Further, Supreme Court did not err in dismissing the petition without first requiring respondents to serve a return. A return is required only after the petition has been granted and the court has issued a writ of habeas corpus (see, CPLR 7006 [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.D.2d 1074, 608 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-abdullah-v-walker-nyappdiv-1993.