People ex rel. Abdul-Matiyn v. Lefevre

150 A.D.2d 891, 540 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6190
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Inasmuch as petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus asserts no issue which could not have been raised in his direct appeal, his application for a writ of error coram nobis or his three CPL 440.10 motions—indeed, he concedes each of his arguments has already been judicially reviewed— the writ was properly denied (see, People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901, 903; People ex rel. Rosado v Miles, 138 AD2d 808).

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Abdul-Matiyn v. Lefevre, 150 A.D.2d 891, 540 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

150 A.D.2d 891 (People ex rel. Abdul-Matiyn v. Lefevre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Christianson v. Berry
165 A.D.2d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)