People ex rel. A. B. v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas

3 How. Pr. 174
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 3 How. Pr. 174 (People ex rel. A. B. v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. A. B. v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas, 3 How. Pr. 174 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

By the Court.

We are of opinion that the suit is now in this court, and that the relator, if entitled to relief, must apply here by motion. The court intimated a doubt, even if the suit was one which remained in the county court, whether tie writ of mandamus could be further prosecuted—and refused further to hear the argument, and struck the cause from the calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 How. Pr. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-a-b-v-judges-of-yates-common-pleas-nysupct-1847.