People ex rel. 75th Street Realty Corp. v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. 75th Street Realty Corp. v. Miller

255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 970 (People ex rel. 75th Street Realty Corp. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. 75th Street Realty Corp. v. Miller, 255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders unanimously modified by reducing the assessment for the year 1933 to the sum of $1,550,000, representing $550,000 for land value and $1,000,000 for the value of the building; and for the year 1934 to the sum of $1,525,000, which represents an assessment of $525,000 for the land and $1,000,000 for the building, and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. Settle order on notice reversing findings inconsistent with this determination and containing such new findings of fact proved upon the trial as are necessary to sustain the judgment hereby awarded. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders unanimously modified by reducing the assessment for the year 1933 to the sum of $1,550,000, representing $550,000 for land value and $1,000,000 for the value of the building; and for the year 1934 to the sum of $1,525,000, which represents an assessment of $525,000 for the land and $1,000,000 for the building, and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. Settle order on notice reversing findings inconsistent with this determination and containing such new findings of fact proved upon the trial as are necessary to sustain the judgment hereby awarded. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-75th-street-realty-corp-v-miller-nyappdiv-1938.