People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers

96 N.E.2d 756, 302 N.Y. 161, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 760
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 N.E.2d 756 (People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers, 96 N.E.2d 756, 302 N.Y. 161, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 760 (N.Y. 1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the Appellate Division order fails to make the specifications required by section 602 of the Civil Practice Act, we are compelled to presume that questions of fact were not considered and to “ treat the Appellate Division order as being a determination on the law only ” (People ex rel. Sheffield Farms Co. v. Lilly, 295 N. Y. 354, 356; Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. Campo, 301 N. Y. 228). So regarded, the order cannot be sustained. Questions of fact as to the value of the premises during the taxable years in question are presented by the record. The order is accordingly reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division “ for determination upon the questions of fact raised in that court ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 606).

Loughrae, Ch. J., Lewis, Coeway, Desmoed, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mack
86 Misc. 364 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers
278 A.D. 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.2d 756, 302 N.Y. 161, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-711-corp-v-chambers-ny-1951.