People ex rel. 125 Bast 72nd Street Corp. v. Lilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. 125 Bast 72nd Street Corp. v. Lilly

272 A.D.2d 1013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1013 (People ex rel. 125 Bast 72nd Street Corp. v. Lilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. 125 Bast 72nd Street Corp. v. Lilly, 272 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

The order, so far as appealed from, is unanimously modified so as to determine the assessed valuations for the years 1942-43, 1944r-45 and 1945-46 of the property in suit at $1,245,000, comprising $550,000 for the land and $695,000 for the building. The order is unanimously affirmed for 1943-44 inasmuch as the respondents have not appealed therefrom and the total assessment for that year is below those hereby determined for the other years. As so modified the order, so far as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order, so far as appealed from, is unanimously modified so as to determine the assessed valuations for the years 1942-43, 1944r-45 and 1945-46 of the property in suit at $1,245,000, comprising $550,000 for the land and $695,000 for the building. The order is unanimously affirmed for 1943-44 inasmuch as the respondents have not appealed therefrom and the total assessment for that year is below those hereby determined for the other years. As so modified the order, so far as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-125-bast-72nd-street-corp-v-lilly-nyappdiv-1947.