Peopl v. Jackson

58 A.D.2d 741, 396 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12868
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence unanimously reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to Erie County Court for resentencing, and otherwise judgment affirmed. Memorandum: While at the time of the imposition of the sentence, the court did offer defendant’s counsel an opportunity to make a statement, which he did, no similar opportunity was offered to defendant as required by CPL 380.50. Although literal compliance with that statute is not necessary (see People v McClain, 35 NY2d 483), the complete failure here to advise defendant of his right to speak necessitates a finding that the statute was not even substantially complied with (People v Wade, 49 AD2d 770; People v Rizzo, 41 AD2d 691). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court — robbery, second degree.) Present — Moule, J. P., Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peopl v. Jackson, 58 A.D.2d 741, 396 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 741 (Peopl v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Torres
238 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)