PENZOIL-QUAKER STATE v. Cooper

960 So. 2d 864, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10767, 2007 WL 2001636
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 12, 2007
Docket1D07-1636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 960 So. 2d 864 (PENZOIL-QUAKER STATE v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PENZOIL-QUAKER STATE v. Cooper, 960 So. 2d 864, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10767, 2007 WL 2001636 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

960 So.2d 864 (2007)

PENZOIL-QUAKER STATE and Ace USA, Appellants,
v.
Harry COOPER, Appellee.

No. 1D07-1636.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 2007.

Jennifer L. Hodges of Jennifer L. Hodges, P.A., Miami, for Appellants.

William F. Souza, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims being appealed herein is nonfinal and nonappealable, and therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because any error in the interlocutory ruling at issue can be adequately remedied on appeal, we decline appellants' suggestion that we undertake certiorari review.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ALLEN, WOLF, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gay
960 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
960 So. 2d 864, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10767, 2007 WL 2001636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penzoil-quaker-state-v-cooper-fladistctapp-2007.