Pentz v. Hawley

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 69
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedAugust 6, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 69 (Pentz v. Hawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pentz v. Hawley, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 69 (N.Y. 1847).

Opinion

Application for a retaxation of the defendants’ costs, upon the dismissal of the complainant’s bill with costs- Decided that where the schedules annexed to several answers of different defendants are the same, only one charge for the draft should be allowed. That where notice of a special motion is given, and the motion stands over to another day, the party is entitled to a charge for solicitor’s [70]*70and counsel fees for attending to argue the motion when it was not brought on, $2 50, and @3 50 for the term at which the motion was finally argued. The sum of $112 13 directed to be deducted from the bill of costs as taxed. Neither party to have costs as against the other, upon this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pentz-v-hawley-nychanct-1847.