Pentz v. Corscadden

144 P. 157, 49 Mont. 581, 1914 Mont. LEXIS 93
Montana Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1914·No. No. 3,422·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in the court below has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint and directing the [1] dismissal of his action. There was not any judgment entered but only a minute entry of the order. The order is not a judgment (Rev. Codes, secs. 6710, 7139; State ex rel. Allen v. Hawkins, 33 Mont. 177, 82 Pac. 952; Lisker v. O’Rourke, 28 Mont. 129, 72 Pac. 416, 755; Butte & B. C. M. Co. v. Montana Ore Fur. Co., 27 Mont. 152, 69 Pac. 714); neither is it one of the enumerated orders from which an appeal can be taken (sec. 7098, Rev. Codes), and therefore this court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

The pretended appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brantly and Mr. Justice Sanner concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pentz v. Corscadden, 144 P. 157, 49 Mont. 581, 1914 Mont. LEXIS 93 (Mo. 1914).

144 P. 157 (Pentz v. Corscadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prentice Lumber Co. v. Hukill
Montana Supreme Court, 1972
Rambur v. DIEHL LUMBER COMPANY
391 P.2d 1 (Montana Supreme Court, 1964)
Payne v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
385 P.2d 100 (Montana Supreme Court, 1963)
Kelly v. Harris
158 F. Supp. 243 (D. Montana, 1958)
State ex rel. Aho v. Justice Court
313 P.2d 542 (Montana Supreme Court, 1957)
State Ex Rel. Walker v. Board of Com'rs
187 P.2d 1013 (Montana Supreme Court, 1947)
In Re Augestad's Estate
88 P.2d 32 (Montana Supreme Court, 1939)
State Ex Rel. County of Musselshell v. District Court
300 P. 235 (Montana Supreme Court, 1931)
State Ex Rel. Bole v. Lay
300 P. 238 (Montana Supreme Court, 1931)
Heater v. Boston & Montana Corp.
277 P. 11 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)