Pentleton v. Forbes

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Pentleton v. Forbes

19 F. Cas. 211, 1 Cranch 507

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. Cas. 211 (Pentleton v. Forbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pentleton v. Forbes, 19 F. Cas. 211, 1 Cranch 507 (circtddc 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent) rejected the deposition, because the judge had not certified that the witness was cautioned and sworn to testify the whole truth; nor whether the plaintiff was notified of the time and place of caption; nor the precise place of caption. (It was said to be in Westmoreland county, Virginia.) Nor did he certify the place of residence of the plaintiff or his agent

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent) rejected the deposition, because the judge had not certified that the witness was cautioned and sworn to testify the whole truth; nor whether the plaintiff was notified of the time and place of caption; nor the precise place of caption. (It was said to be in Westmoreland county, Virginia.) Nor did he certify the place of residence of the plaintiff or his agent

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F. Cas. 211, 1 Cranch 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pentleton-v-forbes-circtddc-1808.