Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Hinson McAuliffe Individually and as Solicitor General for the County of Fulton, State of Georgia

717 F.2d 517, 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1039, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16029
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 17, 1983·No. 81-7426·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The court voted to consider this case en banc, which resulted in the panel opinion being vacated, 702 F.2d 925. The judges of the en banc court, having heard oral argument and considered the case, are equally divided on the proper disposition. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED by operation of law, and this decision by the court of appeals has no precedential value. Henderson v. Fort Worth Independent School District, 584 F.2d 115 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 906, 99 S.Ct. 1996, 60 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).

AFFIRMED BY OPERATION OF LAW.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Hinson McAuliffe Individually and as Solicitor General for the County of Fulton, State of Georgia, 717 F.2d 517, 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1039, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16029 (11th Cir. 1983).

717 F.2d 517 (Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Hinson McAuliffe Individually and as Solicitor General for the County of Fulton, State of Georgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. Pataki
85 F.3d 919 (Second Circuit, 1996)
West Allis Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bowen
660 F. Supp. 936 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1987)
Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Webb
594 F. Supp. 1186 (N.D. Georgia, 1984)