Home/New Jersey Superior Court App Division/Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

445 A.2d 428, 184 N.J. Super. 130, 1982 N.J. Super. LEXIS 761
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedApril 2, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 445 A.2d 428 (Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 445 A.2d 428, 184 N.J. Super. 130, 1982 N.J. Super. LEXIS 761 (N.J. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lester in his opinion which is reported in 179 N.J.Super. 155.

Absent proof that the process of defendant is akin to a monopoly or constitutes by analogy a public utility, we agree that defendant may assert the conditions here involved when accepting film for processing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.
854 F. Supp. 1164 (D. New Jersey, 1994)
Penthouse International Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
450 A.2d 567 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
American Handling Equip. v. TC Moffatt & Co.
445 A.2d 428 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 A.2d 428, 184 N.J. Super. 130, 1982 N.J. Super. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penthouse-international-ltd-v-eastman-kodak-co-njsuperctappdiv-1982.