Pensyl's Appeal

15 A. 719, 2 Monag. 361, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 798
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 1, 1888
DocketAppeal, No. 28
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 A. 719 (Pensyl's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pensyl's Appeal, 15 A. 719, 2 Monag. 361, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 798 (Pa. 1888).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below did well to adopt the report of the learned auditor. That report thoroughly and justly disposed of the case, and that disposition could not have been reversed or disturbed without doing serious injustice to the accountant.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of appellants.

Errata. — On page 368, second line of exception 3, for “in” read “is.” At the end of this exception, add “4” in brackets.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Voorhies v. Blood
173 So. 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A. 719, 2 Monag. 361, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pensyls-appeal-pa-1888.