Pensyl's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Pensyl's Appeal

15 A. 719, 2 Monag. 361, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 798

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 1, 1888·No. Appeal, No. 28·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The court below did well to adopt the report of the learned auditor. That report thoroughly and justly disposed of the case, and that disposition could not have been reversed or disturbed without doing serious injustice to the accountant.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of appellants.

Errata. — On page 368, second line of exception 3, for “in” read “is.” At the end of this exception, add “4” in brackets.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The court below did well to adopt the report of the learned auditor. That report thoroughly and justly disposed of the case, and that disposition could not have been reversed or disturbed without doing serious injustice to the accountant.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of appellants.

Errata. — On page 368, second line of exception 3, for “in” read “is.” At the end of this exception, add “4” in brackets.

Pensyl's Appeal, 15 A. 719, 2 Monag. 361, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 798 (Pa. 1888).

Pincite

15 A. 719 (Pensyl's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related