Penstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay

424 A.2d 950, 283 Pa. Super. 558, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2071
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 23, 1981·No. 982·Published·Cited by 37 cases

Opinion

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

This is an action in assumpsit that was tried before Judge Caram J. Abood sitting without a jury, who returned, on May 16, 1979, a verdict against all Defendants in the amount of $27,075.53 with interest from January 1, 1978.

Plaintiff-appellee, Penstan Supply, Inc., had sold plumbing supplies to defendants-appellants in 1977 for use by said defendants in plumbing work in the Johnstown area following the July 1977 flood.

Following the non-jury verdict exceptions were filed, briefed and argued pursuant to the provisions of Pa.R.C.P. No. 1038. 1

*560 On October 10, 1979 the Cambria County Court en banc filed an order dismissing the exceptions filed on behalf of the defendants, Construction Concepts and Henry M. Whitehead. 2

An appeal was then taken to this court without final judgment having been entered. The appeal will be quashed.

Before we may consider appellant’s contentions, we must determine whether the appeal from the lower court’s order is properly before us. Although the appellee does not raise this issue, appealability of an order goes to the appellate court’s jurisdiction and may be raised sua sponte. Williams v. Williams, 253 Pa.Super. 444, 385 A.2d 422 (1978); Polascik v. Baldwin, 245 Pa.Super. 1, 369 A.2d 263 (1976); 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 704(b)(2).

*561 An order dismissing exceptions following a trial without jury is in the same category as an order refusing a new trial. It is interlocutory and unappealable. The appeal should not be filed and may not be entertained until a final judgment is entered. 3

Pa.R.C.P. 1038(e) clearly states that final judgment shall be entered. Pa.R.C.P. 1039 provides:

Rule 1039. Entry of Judgment upon Praecipe of a Party
In addition to the provisions of any Rule of Civil Procedure or Act of Assembly authorizing the prothonotary to enter judgment upon praecipe of a party, the prothonotary shall enter judgment upon praecipe of a party in the following instances:
(1) Upon a verdict of a jury, if no timely post trial motion is filed.
(2) When a court grants or denies relief, but does not itself enter judgment or order the prothonotary to do so.
Note: See Rule 237 requiring notice of filing of praecipe for judgment. For illustrative Rules of Civil Procedure specifically authorizing entry of judgment by the prothonotary on praecipe of a party, see Rules 1037, 1047, 1128, 1265(a), 1272(d), (e), 1276(a), 1277, 1511, 1519(a), 1659, 3031(a) and 3146.
For rules authorizing the prothonotary to enter judgment on praecipe of a party where no exceptions are filed to the decision of the court in a non-jury trial or in an equity action, see Rules 1038(e) and 1519.

*562 Added, effective April 19, 1971; amended March 28, 1973, effective July 1, 1973.

The appeal is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay, 424 A.2d 950, 283 Pa. Super. 558, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2071 (Pa. Ct. App. 1981).

424 A.2d 950 (Penstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Brong
468 A.2d 509 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. Nixon
458 A.2d 976 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Inryco, Inc. v. Helmark Steel Inc.
451 A.2d 511 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Hammond v. Hammond
447 A.2d 1047 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Boise Cascade Corp. v. East Stroudsburg Savings Ass'n
446 A.2d 614 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Donson v. Satterthwaite
444 A.2d 141 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Hilliard v. Hilliard
441 A.2d 1251 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Laurel National Bank v. Mutual Benefit Insurance
441 A.2d 756 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Hassler v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
439 A.2d 762 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Black Top Paving Co., Inc. v. John Carlo, Inc.
437 A.2d 446 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Gdovic v. Catholic Knights of St. George
437 A.2d 65 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Goldberg v. Goldberg
437 A.2d 64 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Murray v. Abcon, Inc.
435 A.2d 1301 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Levin v. Desert Palace, Inc.
435 A.2d 1292 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Evans v. Government Employees Insurance
435 A.2d 1258 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School Authority
435 A.2d 1288 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Coren v. DiDomenico
435 A.2d 1252 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Whitfield v. Farrior
435 A.2d 877 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Karpe v. Borough of Stroudsburg
434 A.2d 1292 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Fowler & Williams, Inc. v. International Lithographing
434 A.2d 792 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)