Penske Logistics v. WCAB Pet of: Troxel
This text of Penske Logistics v. WCAB Pet of: Troxel (Penske Logistics v. WCAB Pet of: Troxel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
PENSKE LOGISTICS AND GALLAGHER : No. 164 MM 2015 BASSETT SERVICES, INC. : : : v. : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (EDWIN TROXEL) : : : PETITION OF: EDWIN TROXEL :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File
Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Penske Logistics v. WCAB Pet of: Troxel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penske-logistics-v-wcab-pet-of-troxel-pa-2015.