Home/Supreme Court/PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express

PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express

371 U.S. 184, 83 S. Ct. 264, 9 L. Ed. 2d 227, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 66
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 3, 1962·No. 222·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express, 371 U.S. 184, 83 S. Ct. 264, 9 L. Ed. 2d 227, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 66 (1962).

371 U.S. 184 (PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danna v. Air France
334 F. Supp. 52 (S.D. New York, 1971)
Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States
433 F.2d 212 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)
Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States of America, Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc.
433 F.2d 212 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)
Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express
323 F.2d 769 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)