Penry v. Lynaugh
487 U.S. 1233, 108 S. Ct. 2896
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 30, 1988·No. No. 87-6177·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Penry v. Lynaugh, 487 U.S. 1233, 108 S. Ct. 2896 (1988).
487 U.S. 1233 (Penry v. Lynaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Romero v. Collins
Fifth Circuit, 1992
Jesus Romero, Jr. v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
961 F.2d 1181 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Stephen Albert McCoy v. James A. Lynaugh, Director Texas Department of Corrections
874 F.2d 954 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
Leon Rutherford King v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
868 F.2d 1400 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
James v. Butler
538 So. 2d 576 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)
State v. Brooks
541 So. 2d 801 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1989)
Warren Eugene Bridge v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
856 F.2d 712 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
State ex rel. Ward v. Butler
532 So. 2d 162 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)
Bell v. Lynaugh
699 F. Supp. 597 (E.D. Texas, 1988)