Penrose v. Hart

1 U.S. 378, 1 Dall. 378
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided December 15, 1788·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

But

Shippen, President,

said, that the practice had been otherwise; and he thought with great reason and propriety. He remembered to have heard of an old decision when Logan was Chief Justice, in which it was expressly settled, that money paid on account of a bond, should first be applied to discharge the interest due at the time of the payment, and the residue, if any, credited towards satisfaction of the principal. By this rule, the Gentlemen of the Bar had uniformly governed their calculations before the Revolution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Penrose v. Hart, 1 U.S. 378, 1 Dall. 378 (1788).

1 U.S. 378 (Penrose v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. Arizona, 2026
Hart v. Dorman
2 Fla. 445 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1849)
Spires v. Hamot
8 Watts & Serg. 17 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1844)
Dean v. Williams
17 Mass. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1821)
Fitch v. Ross
4 Serg. & Rawle 557 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1818)